Guiding The Geek In You
Invented by Trygve Reenskaug, who originally called it the “Thing-Model-View-Editor” way back in 1979 (read all about it), the MVC design pattern has been a staple in software design since it appeared in the Smalltalk-80 class library.
Discussing software design patterns exceeds this post by light years, as does the interior magic of MVC (and siblings such as MVP, and MVVM, and so on). However, let’s cover a couple quick concepts in as non-boring-as-hell way as possible.
The MVC design pattern is focuses on “separation of concerns”. Meaning, software built using this design pattern is composed of pieces belonging to one of three main areas:
For example, when the user interacts with the software by changing the contents of the first name field, the controller handles the user input and changes the state of the model (which is responsible for storing that name somewhere). The controller does not directly tell the view “hey, the user changed the first name and I asked the model to save the information.” Instead the view is observing changes made to the model, and when those changes require a refresh of what the user actually observes on-screen – that refresh happens.
This is simplifying a more in-depth process – but hopefully you can appreciate how each piece has a unique role to play, and that the unity of these roles forms a very tight and reliable pattern for software design.
Understand: when you use a framework your code rests upon and within it. There are rules that should be followed, and coloring outside the lines is discouraged – and can sometimes be disastrous. So choose your coloring book with care.
A quality code base and an appropriate feature list. Will the framework do what you need it to do? Do you understand what’s happening under the hood?
Has the framework been endorsed by big companies? Implementation is a great sign of endorsement – do your research, who’s using this framework?
Are other developers actively supporting the framework? How many? Are the builds coming out fast and furious? Stability is good, commitment to growth over time is even better.
Documentation is vital! A big advantage to a JS MVC framework like Backbone is the sheer number of educational resources available to the developer.
Frameworks exist on an “opinionated” scale. Some, like AngularJS and Ember.js, are tremendously opinionated and will, via convention and scaffolding, handle many basic duties on behalf of the developer. These duties can include standardized file and URL structures. Un-opinionated frameworks like Backbone leave file and URL structuring up to the developer, sometimes frameworks even ask the developer to figure out their own routing and data storage solutions.
How interoperable is this framework? If you want to gently insert pieces of a framework into your existing code base, will the framework tolerate it? Backbone is happily inserted where ever you squeeze it. AngularJS is also friendly, but prefers some control – for example AngularJS prefers (but in no way requires) its built-in jqLite over jQuery, mostly because jqLite makes unit testing easier. Ember.js, however, demands total domination. It wants to control the entire page at run time.
Consider your target audience and the devices they likely use. Now, look at the file size of your framework including all dependencies. Realize that fully featured frameworks like Ember.js come equipped with built in solutions and typically only requires a single dependency, handlebars.js. Backbone, on the other hand, despite how lightweight and un-opinionated it is, needs underscore.js and jQuery (for desktops) and / or zepto.js (for mobile) to run. These requirements add weight.
Finally, avoid the insanity caused by YAFS (Yet Another Framework Syndrome) by downloading and using the amazing TodoMVC. TodoMVC is a collection of many of the leading JS MVC frameworks and assigns a single task to each: render a handy little To-Do List application. The UI is friendly and identical between each implementation. All of the code is exposed and ready for analysis. WooHoo!
Consider the problems solved by a framework:
Now consider the pain a framework implementation will bring:
Lastly, keep in mind that implementing single page applications is the core strength of the JS MVC. Therefore, if your project is a basic web page application a framework might be an over-engineered solution. I say “might” because some frameworks, like Backbone, can usefully solve common issues even in these traditional applications.
Awesome! Go download the framework and the dependencies, then load them into your Hello World project template, just like you would a JS library. Or, if you prefer and the option is available, use the CDN made available by the framework community.
After the World has been Hello’ed adequately, study the TodoMVC implementation of your framework. Peel back the covers, read the comments, study the hell out of the source and do your best to understand what is going on. You may come to rely on the awesome magic Ember.js, AngularJS, or your MVC of choice provides – but first do your best to understand it!
Finally, start your own project. In upcoming posts I will be discussing my project, including which framework I use and why. Stay tuned, and thanks for reading!
One thought on “Understanding JS MVC Frameworks”
Pingback: KnockoutJs and AngularJs Links | Stuart's Blog